Photo Gallery

Photo Gallery

Photo Gallery

Photo Gallery

Photo Gallery

Photo Gallery

Photo Gallery

30/07/2016

A Come Back to Home after 23 Years; Farewell article to Dzongkhag Forestry

Dzongkhag Forestry Sector was born 23 years after the nationalization of forest in Bhutan and lived for another 23 years making ease to put decentralized forestry activities into practice most particularly in upholding the sustainable and participatory forest management. The sector made a giant step in 1997 by launching the country’s first community forest in Mongar under the guidance of Social Forestry & Extension Division (SFED), and thereafter about 600 communities received their right to manage the forest. 

Fig: Farewell Speech by Dasho Dzongdag to Dzongkhag Forestry

Had there not been Dzongkhag Forestry Sector then it would be easier said than done to shift from traditional tree orientated system to the current practice of balanced tree conservation and sustainable usage. The Sector supported not only the community forest but also gave equal weightage to improve the health of State Reserve Forest (SRF) by planting forest crops, bioengineering the critical landslide prone zones, protecting the water sources and many more. In so doing the private individuals also received helping hand from the Sector to own woods in their unproductive private lands and thereby adding more trees to the state.

Fig: Sharing of Gifts during farewell party 

Now the parent organization has made a homecoming call by merging the Dzongkhag Forestry Sector and Divisional Forest Office into one. It would be a shock to the communities to see forestry officials working under one umbrella but nothing to be worried for they shall continue to receive technical supports and forestry services as before. However the concern is not on about going back home to work but with regard to the working infrastructures. For time being the field staffs may function from the RNR-Extension Centre but one day or the other they deserve to be under a good shelter of their own. So, we are hopeful that the Department may have made arrangements to build the needed infrastructures. With this, I wish my workmates to serve with loyalty to protect our nation’s green property and also delivery the services to the people as before. Goodbye to Dzongkhag Forestry Sector.
Fig: First Day at Divisional office, Joint meeting at Mongar


10/07/2016

Facebook Like Button

Hundreds of likes wouldn’t be out of the blue if my Facebook post reads that I’m arranging alumni get-together or my wife is with young. One cannot put a stop to hit the like button after having seen eye-catching snapshot not caring whether you know the one who uploaded it or not. I accept as true that Mark Zuckerberg added such feature in his website so that the users can use it as a throwaway gestures for having liked the content.

But in this era of cyber culture, many of us have forgotten that there is inbuilt thinking machine in us which takes no second to make a judgment of what we see. What I mean is that many of us just hit like on no matter what the post is without actually analyzing whether it is appropriate to like it or not. For example, if someone notifies via Facebook that a big cheese passed away then in no minute the post will gain fat likes. Revisit the post and then put your mind in work, what do the likes mean? Does it stand for our happiness over the death of him/her? Yes, from hundred likes, there might be someone who is pleased to find out that the one he/she hates has taken the last breathe, but what about our likes? Or are we acknowledging the one who posted it for the timely information? Again, don’t you find it funny to see hundreds of like with no comment when someone writes, “I’m new to the place and have no friends so can anyone join me to get rid of my loneliness?” It’s akin to saying that we are sending you hundreds of likes, so enjoy the company. A recent post with scores of like on donation box robbery by a monk in Punakha serves a mere example of such foolishness. Are we happy that the monk is successful in robbery, or the temple was robbed, or the monk was caught? What are we trying to convey? I’m confused! Are you not? Haha my article is with more questions than answers mosh. It not necessarily means that all users are same; there are some who spare time to drop comments and some who read but do not partake in giving weightage to the post.


FIG: 2 Million likes for death of Paul Walker 

Few months back I being an administrator invited suggestion from the members on about whether to deactivate the group since it is dormant and served no purpose. It was bolt from the blue that I saw only likes and no single comment, only later a couple of members shared their view not to deactivate it. Are the rest pleased to read that the group will be permanently rub out from Facebook so that they could not stop themselves in giving thumbs-up to the post? I was confused whether to listen to those two members or to go with majority win basis since likes in the post spoke more words than the comments. For a moment or two I judge that many hits like to your post to let you know that they read it; it’s like saying that you will be not neglected for what on earth you post. But what’s the use when you press like to read that he/she is feeling pissed off, feels heartbreaking, under the weather, etc. Therefore, I request all the Facebookers to use the like button meaningfully, in no way playing with the emotion of others or otherwise what will happen to the cyber if brains of people who can shape the cyber depend on it to think for them. Think wisely, use wisely, happy Facebooking.